| Time: | 7:00 - 8:30 pm | |
| Location: | Ed Center Auditorium | |
| Present: | Bill Hirsh, Jeannie Webb, David Brewer, Gary Heldt, Stan Manley, Tod Schneider, Artemio Paz, Jr., Ron Sanetel, Nadine Jackson, Kathy Ging, Nori Hemphill, Ellen Wojahn, Bev Sept, Patricia Hansen, Donna Libby, Jack Harris, Jeff Faust, and Dennis Urso. | |
| Absent: | Bob Johnson, Christopher Ramey, Valerie Wedel, Micheal Roberts, Patrick Bayes, Tony Reyneke, William McConochie, Pat Bonney, Cindee Cramer. | |
| Notetaker: | Christine McKinnon, Transportation Department | |
| Time | Topic | Presenter |
Public Comment/Review AgendaThe meeting was opened by Jeannie Webb at 7:07 with a welcome and a mention that Bill Hirsh would be explaining the nuts and bolts of tonights process (with a few corroded pipes thrown in for good measure). |
Jeannie | |
Facilities Task Group - Business Items
|
Bill | |
Sub-Committee Work TimeThe sub-committees will meet to consolidate interests. This is a visioning task…put yourselves in the future and imagine what you might want regarding feasibility and desirability. There are no restrictions to creating your dream…no limitations…let your imaginations soar. While in your small groups keep track of the information requests your members want….do you want to be contacted via e mail or by personal presentation? When you break into small groups the first thing you do is to choose someone to write down your requests. This really shouldn’t take 15 minutes of yammering to decide, just pick the person who has resided in Lane County the least amount of time. Please identify your needs and info requests.One member requested that the committees keep indoor air quality a concern in their deliberations. At 7:22 everyone broke into small groups to discuss specific dreams and visions for the future. When we returned 35 minutes later David suggested that anyone with additional thoughts and comments should e mail him directly at SFCFacil.lane.edu since we won’t have time tonight to discuss everything at length. The following reports were made: |
||
School Safety and Security
Solve the problem/not cover it up |
||
New School vs Remodel (large vs. small)
|
||
After School Activities
This small group also wanted input from child care providers who would have an interest in how a building was designed for their use. |
||
Physical Structure and Design
|
||
Debrief/ClosureFor the January 18th meeting we will need to have feedback from the January 11th presentation. The “presentation committee” will report back at that time. Some information may be ready for our perusal and other info may not be ready. Send your thoughts to David Brewer and he will make sure everyone is notified. Items will then be put on the agenda. A suggestion was made for a 15 minute brainstorming session with the whole group. Is that too long? Does anyone else feel it is necessary? Maybe it is too late for that? A vote was called for and the majority felt it was not necessary. Without a consensus, the idea was dropped. Another question asked was how are the principals inputting their thoughts. Bill said we were doing broad based community work in this committee and not making decisions for any specific project. Before any project was considered we would work with all staff affected by project. This includes administration, instructional, parents, and students. Details for new projects would be formulated only after careful consideration of everyone’s input and opinions. |
||
Next Meeting AgendaThe next Task Force Group meeting is scheduled for January 18, 2000 where we will hear the feedback from the January 11th presentation and confirm subsequent meeting dates. |
||
| 8:41 | Adjourned. | |
| Special Note: Mailserv list for Facilities Task Group – SFCFACIL | ||
| < Return to Facilities > | ||
|
Schools
of the Future | Site Map
| Search