| Time: |
5:15 - 7:00 pm |
| Location: |
Roosevelt Middle School Library |
| Present: |
Task Group Members: Erik Browning, Mike Dubick,
Mike Garling, Robert Gordon-McCutchan, Cindy Hinton, Susan Hirata, Richard
Leebrick, Robert Jackson, Mac McFadden, Will Mueller, Penny O’Leary, Diane
Pergamit, Maxine Proskurowski, Hal Sadofsky, Anne Schrenk, Ollie Snowden,
Fred Tepfer, Jan VanderTuin, Sandy Vaughn, Cassady Walters, Alice Wheeler,
and Lynda Whitener. Staff and Facilitators: David Piercy and
Margot Helphand. |
| Absent: |
Task Group Members: Bahati Ansari, Joanne
Austin, Caroline Hopkins, Sharon Schuman, Beckie Smolek. Staff and
Facilitators: Betsy Shepard. |
| Notetaker: |
|
|
|
|
| Time |
Topic |
Presenter |
|
Agenda:
-
Meeting Schedule
-
Overview of Choice in 4J
-
Trends from LCOG Presentation
-
Workplan
Next Meeting: Wednesday, November 18, 1999, 7:00 pm, Roosevelt Middle
School Library
|
|
|
Critical Discussion and Decisions:
Topic 1: Meeting Schedule
Decision: The committee agreed to the following meeting schedule.
All meetings will be at 7:00 pm, in the Roosevelt Middle School Library.
-
Thursday, November 18
-
Wednesday, December 8
-
Thursday, January 6
-
Thursday, January 20
-
Wednesday, January 26
Schools of the Future Committee Meetings that involve the School Choice
Task Group:
-
Tuesday, January 11, Dialogue with the Schools of the Future Committee
-
Tuesday, February 8, Presentation of Initial Recommendations
|
|
|
Topic 2: Overview of School Choice in 4J
David Piercy gave an overview of school choice in 4J. A copy of the
overheads and handouts that include data, policies, rules, and background
information is available on request. Mr. Piercy’s comments are summarized
below.
-
In the early and mid 1970s District 4J moved to a program of school choice
that allowed for the establishment of public alternative schools with individual
charters and the ability of parents to enroll their students in any neighborhood
school that had space.
-
When the school board adopted an alternative school policy back then it
stated, “The board of directors recognizes that the educational
goals of School District 4J can best be attained through educational programs
as diverse as students'' needs within a pluralistic society. Therefore,
the board endorses the development of a variety of alternative schools
through the cooperative efforts of educators, parents, students, and/or
community resources.” School Board Policy 7225.
-
In part, the establishment of this program of choice was influenced by
the national dissatisfaction with government that followed Vietnam and
Watergate. (Lawson, Herman, "A System of Uncommon Schools: The History
of Eugene School District 4J 1854-1985.") This is not unlike the
current reasons being given nationally to establish school choice and school
voucher programs, although the political thoughts are different.
-
Over the years the program of choice became very popular with many families
in the community. Approximately 30% of the student population attend
alternative schools or transfer between schools.
Transfers Between Neighborhood Schools and Into Alternative
Schools, (December 1998):
-
There has been criticism about these two choice programs. The criticism
ranges from the negative impact they have on enrollment at certain neighborhoods,
their location, their cost, equal access by all students and families,
enrollment procedures, and their higher socioeconomic status.
-
These are not the only choices that exist in Eugene today. The range
of options has expanded dramatically over the last 10 or 15 years.
The expansion of the choices available to children was not done as the
result of a master plan, but rather to respond to various requests and
needs that have arisen. This is a perfect time to outline the criteria
that could go into a master plan.
-
There are various kinds of choices available to students today who attend
schools is District 4J.
|
|
|
Transfers between Neighborhood Schools
|
|
District Elementary Alternative Schools
|
|
District Secondary Alternative Schools
|
|
|
|
|
Exchanges Between School Districts
|
|
In-District Alternative Education Programs
|
|
Private Alternative Education Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: These numbers are not additive.
-
Literally every district school has children who transfer in and out of
it. See Handout: Elementary, Middle, and High School
Transfers.
-
Local school districts exchange an equal number of students. Many
students request transfers between school districts.
-
There are a number of in-district and private alternative education programs
that have been designed for students who are at risk of school problems
or of dropping out. Most recently we have private alternative education
programs that are being established that would like to focus on a particular
curriculum area (e.g., Center for Appropriate Transport and Lord Leebrick
Theater). See Handout: Alternative Education Programs.
-
Enrollment Trends: Enrollment from 1990 to 1999 has increased from 18,032
to 18,573, but has declined from a high of 18,853 in 1993. We predict
a declining enrollment through 2004-05 to a low of 17,608. Enrollment
at the elementary level is declining while enrollment at the high school
level is increasing.
-
Issues Related to Alternative Schools. These are some of the issues
related to educational choice in 4J:
-
Equity of Access to District Programs of Choice
-
Transportation/Environmental Issues
-
The Impact of Declining Enrollment on Alternative Schools vs. Neighborhood
Schools
-
Role and Funding of Private Alternative Education Programs
-
Responsibility to Be Responsive to Home Schooled Students
-
Size of School
-
Charter Schools
|
David Piercy |
|
Topic 3: Other Information Requests
Discussion: Members of the task group made the following information
requests:
-
How do parents know about choice?
-
How many students are there in private schools?
-
How are special education students counted in the transfer grids?
-
What are the criteria for SES?
-
What is the current supply and demand for the choice program?
-
How are alternatives started and how are they evaluated to determine that
they meet their original purpose?
-
Can you provide data by school showing SES data and student
performance?
-
How are small schools funded?
-
Why do folks choose alternatives?
-
Are there models where neighborhood schools and alternative schools co-exist
successfully?
-
What are the caps for enrollment in alternative and neighborhood schools?
-
Can you show a comparison of enrollment trends in alternative and neighborhood
schools?
-
How can private alternative programs and neighborhood schools co-exist?
-
How are Eugene Education Funds distributed?
-
What is the total funding per school?
|
|
|
Topic 4: Trends from LCOG Scan: Eugene 4J Schools of the Future Environmental
Scan
Discussion: The committee discussed the presentation from LCOG that
had been given the previous evening to the Schools of the Future Committee.
Enrollment is declining overall, but there is an increase of enrollment
at the high school level. There is more diversity in the community,
with Hispanics being the fastest growing group. There are more single
parent homes and the majority of homes will not have children.
|
|
|
Topic 5: Review of Work Plan
Discussion/Decision: Margot presented the work plan, which was accepted
in concept. The task group will focus on the workplace at the next
meeting, especially how it will get broad-based opinions from the community
about school choice. The work plan is summarized below:
-
Form Task Group (Completed)
-
Current School Choice Picture (In process)
-
Identify Criteria for Decision Making
-
Develop Initial Criteria for Evaluating Recommendations
-
Solicit and Evaluate Community Input
-
Revise Characteristics and Recommendations
-
Prepare Final Recommendations to the School of the Future Committee
|
Margot Helphand |
|
Topic 6: Agenda for Next Meeting
The tentative agenda for the next meeting includes developing a plan for
community input, identifying criteria for decision making, summarizing
key issues, and summarizing descriptors of current characteristics.
< Return to School Choice >
|
|