4J Intranet Site Map
Schools of the Future Home Page : School Choice

November 10 Minutes: School Choice

Time: 5:15 - 7:00 pm
Location: Roosevelt Middle School Library
Present: Task Group Members: Erik Browning, Mike Dubick, Mike Garling, Robert Gordon-McCutchan, Cindy Hinton, Susan Hirata, Richard Leebrick, Robert Jackson, Mac McFadden, Will Mueller, Penny O’Leary, Diane Pergamit, Maxine Proskurowski, Hal Sadofsky, Anne Schrenk, Ollie Snowden, Fred Tepfer, Jan VanderTuin, Sandy Vaughn, Cassady Walters, Alice Wheeler, and Lynda Whitener.  Staff and Facilitators:  David Piercy and Margot Helphand. 
Absent: Task Group Members:  Bahati Ansari, Joanne Austin, Caroline Hopkins, Sharon Schuman, Beckie Smolek.  Staff and Facilitators:  Betsy Shepard. 
Notetaker:  
Time Topic Presenter
Agenda: 
  • Meeting Schedule
  • Overview of Choice in 4J
  • Trends from LCOG Presentation 
  • Workplan
Next Meeting: Wednesday, November 18, 1999, 7:00 pm, Roosevelt Middle School Library 
 
 
 

Critical Discussion and Decisions:

Topic 1: Meeting Schedule  

Decision:  The committee agreed to the following meeting schedule.  All meetings will be at 7:00 pm, in the Roosevelt Middle School Library. 
  •  Thursday, November 18 
  •  Wednesday, December 8 
  •  Thursday, January 6 
  •  Thursday, January 20 
  •  Wednesday, January 26 
Schools of the Future Committee Meetings that involve the School Choice Task Group: 
  • Tuesday, January 11, Dialogue with the Schools of the Future Committee 
  • Tuesday, February 8, Presentation of Initial Recommendations 

  •  

Topic 2: Overview of School Choice in 4J 

David Piercy gave an overview of school choice in 4J.  A copy of the overheads and handouts that include data, policies, rules, and background information is available on request.  Mr. Piercy’s comments are summarized below. 
  • In the early and mid 1970s District 4J moved to a program of school choice that allowed for the establishment of public alternative schools with individual charters and the ability of parents to enroll their students in any neighborhood school that had space. 
  • When the school board adopted an alternative school policy back then it stated,   “The board of directors recognizes that the educational goals of School District 4J can best be attained through educational programs as diverse as students'' needs within a pluralistic society.  Therefore, the board endorses the development of a variety of alternative schools through the cooperative efforts of educators, parents, students, and/or community resources.”   School Board Policy 7225.
  • In part, the establishment of this program of choice was influenced by the national dissatisfaction with government that followed Vietnam and Watergate.  (Lawson, Herman, "A System of Uncommon Schools: The History of Eugene School District 4J 1854-1985.")  This is not unlike the current reasons being given nationally to establish school choice and school voucher programs, although the political thoughts are different. 
  • Over the years the program of choice became very popular with many families in the community.  Approximately 30% of the student population attend alternative schools or transfer between schools.

  • Transfers Between Neighborhood Schools and Into Alternative Schools, (December 1998):  
    Level:
    Enrollment:
    Transfers:
    Elementary
    8,096
    2,891 
    Middle
    4,341
       838
    High
    5,757
    1,120
  • There has been criticism about these two choice programs.  The criticism ranges from the negative impact they have on enrollment at certain neighborhoods, their location, their cost, equal access by all students and families, enrollment procedures, and their higher socioeconomic status.
  • These are not the only choices that exist in Eugene today.  The range of options has expanded dramatically over the last 10 or 15 years.  The expansion of the choices available to children was not done as the result of a master plan, but rather to respond to various requests and needs that have arisen.  This is a perfect time to outline the criteria that could go into a master plan.
  • There are various kinds of choices available to students today who attend schools is District 4J.
    Choices in 4J 
 
    Neighborhood Schools
    13,345
    Transfers between Neighborhood Schools
      3,234
    District Elementary Alternative Schools
      1,617
    District Secondary Alternative Schools
      1,766
    Magnet Learning Centers 
    Exchanges Between School Districts
         261
    In-District Alternative Education Programs
         571
    Private Alternative Education Programs 
         491
    Home Schooling
         272 
    Charter Schools 
  Note:  These numbers are not additive. 
  • Literally every district school has children who transfer in and out of it.  See  Handout:  Elementary, Middle, and High School Transfers. 
  • Local school districts exchange an equal number of students.  Many students request transfers between school districts. 
 
    Bethel
     128 
    Springfield
       88
    Harrisburg
       14
    Junction City 
       11 
    Fern Ridge
         7
    Pleasant Hill 
         5
    Crow
         2
    Creswell 
         2
    Blachly
         2
    Cottage Grove
         1
 
  • There are a number of in-district and private alternative education programs that have been designed for students who are at risk of school problems or of dropping out.  Most recently we have private alternative education programs that are being established that would like to focus on a particular curriculum area (e.g., Center for Appropriate Transport and Lord Leebrick Theater).  See Handout:  Alternative Education Programs. 
  • Enrollment Trends: Enrollment from 1990 to 1999 has increased from 18,032 to 18,573, but has declined from a high of 18,853 in 1993.  We predict a declining enrollment through 2004-05 to a low of 17,608.  Enrollment at the elementary level is declining while enrollment at the high school level is increasing. 
  • Issues Related to Alternative Schools.  These are some of the issues related to educational choice in 4J: 
    • Equity of Access to District Programs of Choice 
    • Transportation/Environmental Issues 
    • The Impact of Declining Enrollment on Alternative Schools vs. Neighborhood Schools 
    • Role and Funding of Private Alternative Education Programs 
    • Responsibility to Be Responsive to Home Schooled Students 
    • Size of School 
    • Charter Schools

David Piercy

Topic 3: Other Information Requests 

Discussion:  Members of the task group made the following information requests: 
  • How do parents know about choice?
  • How many students are there in private schools?
  • How are special education students counted in the transfer grids? 
  • What are the criteria for SES? 
  • What is the current supply and demand for the choice program? 
  • How are alternatives started and how are they evaluated to determine that they meet their original purpose? 
  • Can you provide data by school showing SES data and student   performance? 
  • How are small schools funded? 
  • Why do folks choose alternatives? 
  • Are there models where neighborhood schools and alternative schools co-exist successfully? 
  • What are the caps for enrollment in alternative and neighborhood schools? 
  • Can you show a comparison of enrollment trends in alternative and neighborhood schools? 
  • How can private alternative programs and neighborhood schools co-exist? 
  • How are Eugene Education Funds distributed? 
  • What is the total funding per school? 

Topic 4: Trends from LCOG Scan: Eugene 4J Schools of the Future Environmental Scan

Discussion:  The committee discussed the presentation from LCOG that had been given the previous evening to the Schools of the Future Committee.  Enrollment is declining overall, but there is an increase of enrollment at the high school level.  There is more diversity in the community, with Hispanics being the fastest growing group.  There are more single parent homes and the majority of homes will not have children. 
 

Topic 5:  Review of Work Plan 

Discussion/Decision: Margot presented the work plan, which was accepted in concept.  The task group will focus on the workplace at the next meeting, especially how it will get broad-based opinions from the community about school choice.  The work plan is summarized below: 
  •  Form Task Group (Completed) 
  •  Current School Choice Picture (In process) 
  •  Identify Criteria for Decision Making 
  •  Develop Initial Criteria for Evaluating Recommendations 
  •  Solicit and Evaluate Community Input 
  •  Revise Characteristics and Recommendations 
  •  Prepare Final Recommendations to the School of the Future Committee 
Margot Helphand

Topic 6:  Agenda for Next Meeting 

The tentative agenda for the next meeting includes developing a plan for community input, identifying criteria for decision making, summarizing key issues, and summarizing descriptors of current characteristics. 
 

< Return to School Choice
 

 
4J Home Page | Schools of the Future | Site Map | Search


 


Please send comments or questions to the 4J Web Team.
200 North Monroe Street - Eugene, Oregon, 97402 Phone: 541-687-3123
Eugene School District 4J